Monday, December 6, 2010
| | | About the Blog

New York

  • Hotel Boutique At Grand Central
  • Courtyard New York Downtown Manhattan/Financial District
  • Doubletree By Hilton Times Square West
  • Hilton Garden Inn Midtown East
  • Hilton Garden Inn Queens/Jfk Airport

Minneapolis

  • Hilton Garden Inn Minneapolis University Area
  • Ac Hotel Minneapolis Downtown

Singapore

  • Pan Pacific Orchard
  • Lyf Farrer Park Singapore

Boston

  • Residence Inn Boston Harbor On Tudor Wharf
  • Residence Inn Boston Downtown/South End

Taormina

  • Atlantis Bay Taormina

Miami Beach

  • Park Royal Miami Beach

Dallas

  • Doubletree By Hilton Dallas Market Center

New Orleans

  • Sonesta Es Suites New Orleans Downtown

Lake Ariel

  • Comfort Inn Pocono Lakes Region

Kanazawa

  • Hyatt Centric Kanazawa

Fort Lee

  • Hyatt Place Fort Lee / George Washington Bridge

Playa de Muro (Mallorca)

  • Iberostar Selection Playa De Muro Village

College Station

  • The George Hotel College Station

Amsterdam

  • Botel Amsterdam

Paramus

  • Hampton Inn Paramus

Tokyo

  • Asakusa Tobu Hotel

Durango

  • Quality Inn Durango

San Jose

  • Ac Hotel San Jose Downtown

Philadelphia

  • Canopy By Hilton Philadelphia Center City

Bermuda Run

  • Hampton Inn Bermuda Run

Chelsea

  • Hampton Inn Boston Logan Airport Chelsea

Lakewood

  • Hilton Garden Inn Lakewood Nj

Las Vegas

  • Springhill Suites Las Vegas Convention Center

Paris

  • Citadines Trocadero Paris

Charlotte

  • Ac Hotel Charlotte Southpark

Auburn

  • Hampton Inn Auburn Ma

Doral

  • Four Points By Sheraton Miami Airport

Fishkill

  • Hampton Inn Fishkill

College Park

  • Hampton Inn College Park

Washington

  • Ac Hotel Washington Dc Downtown

Nanuet

  • Hampton Inn Nanuet

Newport

  • Cliffside Inn Newport

Smyrna

  • Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel

Williamsburg

  • Four Points By Sheraton Orlando Convention Center

Fort Collins

  • Armstrong Hotel Fort Collins

Arlington

  • Hilton Garden Inn Arlington Shirlington

Seattle

  • Hampton Inn Seattle Downtown

San Francisco

  • Hampton Inn San Francisco Downtown/Convention Center

Nantes

  • Citadines Confluent Nantes

Suffolk

  • Hilton Garden Inn Suffolk Riverfront

Oakbrook Terrace

  • Hilton Chicago/Oak Brook Suites

Myrtle Beach

  • Dunes Village

Punta Cana

  • Bahia Principe Luxury Ambar

Savannah

  • Pooler Ga Hotels

Milan

  • Best Areas To Stay In Milan

Mamaia

  • Mamaia Romania

FedEx Citizenship Blog
  • Citizenship Blog Home
    • Community & Disaster Relief
    • Economics & Access
    • Environment & Efficiency
    • People & Workplace

Popular Terms

Community community service corporate responsibility CSR disaster relief Economics economy education environment FedEx Ground sustainability Teach For America
More terms >
Get the latest FedEx Citizenship Report

Archive

2009
2008

People & Workplace

A Discussion on the RLA and UPS Campaign

By Fred Smith on June 24, 2009
 
26459 Views
Send to a friend
Plane_Flying_jpg2.jpg

There is a campaign in Washington that threatens the ability of FedEx and its team members to serve our customers.  For the past few months, FedEx Express has been the target of an extensive special-interest lobbying campaign by UPS to have Congress pass legislation to change our status under the Railway Labor Act (RLA).

We are doing everything in our power to fight this effort. Removing FedEx Express from RLA jurisdiction could expose our customers at any time to local work stoppages that interrupt the flow of their time-sensitive, high-value shipments through our global network. Keeping our RLA classification means our customers can count on the reliability of FedEx Express.

Let me explain how this challenge to FedEx evolved.  It all begins with the Railway Labor Act.

The Railway Labor Act
The Railway Labor Act was originally passed by Congress in 1926 to limit economically crippling strikes. The law was a direct response to damaging local strikes that had bottle-necked railroads, the national transportation system of that period, and hobbled the economy.

In time, the law expanded to cover airlines and express carriers. FedEx Express, as an air express carrier with a combined air/ground network, has been accurately covered under the RLA since the company was founded almost four decades ago. The RLA, then and now, offers employees a way to unionize if they choose and engage in collective bargaining while, at the same time, protecting national (now global) commerce from crippling work stoppages. It’s a common-sense balance that benefits all parties.

All employees at U.S. airlines have always been covered by the RLA, and FedEx Express remains an airline-centered operation.  Consider the following:

  • The RLA status of FedEx Express has been continually reaffirmed by courts and federal agencies.
  • The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in 1991 that FedEx is the kind of integrated system covered by the Railway Labor Act.  The Supreme Court declined to even hear the case because of the soundness of the ruling.
  • In 1996, Congress also reaffirmed that FedEx Express employees were classified properly under the RLA.

 

Every court or agency that has looked at the issue has ruled that FedEx Express belongs under the RLA.

The RLA and the NLRA
Under the RLA, groups that wish to unionize must do so across nationwide classes of employees. The RLA also requires mandatory government-led mediation of contract disputes supervised by the National Mediation Board before a union can strike or an employer can replace employees or impose contract terms.  Once again, it’s an effort to provide a balanced approach for all involved in the process.

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) is another law that governs union organizing and collective bargaining. It is a more general piece of legislation geared to general and local labor situations. The NLRA covers the vast majority of American workers since only a small percentage of people work in national transportation systems. Under the NLRA, employees can unionize in small localized groups, and government led mediation is not a required step in the negotiation process.

UPS and the NLRA
There is a reason UPS is trying to change the regulatory rules now.  They haven’t been able to win in open competition so they are trying to win by lobbying.  Let me explain.

UPS has been under the NLRA since that law was passed in 1935 because they have always been a ground company. When UPS began its airline segment in the 1980s, the employees in that segment, mostly pilots and mechanics, were classified under the RLA – like all other airlines, including FedEx Express. However, UPS does not handle their air shipments in a separate and distinct network that ties directly into their air operation, as FedEx Express does. That’s why their pickup and delivery employees have remained covered by the NLRA. 

Throughout the 1990s, UPS tried to have their drivers reclassified from the NLRA to the RLA. Every time, the independent regulators said no. For example, in 1991, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that FedEx is exactly the kind of essential, integrated air service the RLA was designed to cover.  In 1996, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit found that FedEx trucking services principally serve our air-delivery services whereas UPS’ trucking services do not.  They confirmed that UPS’ non-airline operations were correctly classified under the NLRA.

Only after a decade of failure at that effort did UPS join the Teamsters in trying to reclassify FedEx Express. That is why UPS and the Teamsters are now putting so much time, money and effort into changing the RLA itself.

The UPS Campaign
The UPS lobbying campaign resulted in language being inserted into the House version of the FAA Reauthorization Bill that would alter the status of most FedEx Express employees. That provision is not in the Senate version of the bill at this time. The Senate will likely complete a second version of the bill, and the two versions would then be reconciled into a final bill to be voted upon by both houses of Congress in the coming months.

Here’s where we stand:

  • We firmly believe the RLA is the proper classification for our company.
  • Unlike our competition, we operate an integrated air/ground network and handle air shipments separately in that network. RLA jurisdiction gives us the best opportunity to deliver reliable, uninterrupted service to customers.
  • It is that superior service that has allowed us to grow despite the best efforts of a larger competitor -- UPS. Their current Washington lobbying campaign seeks to gain a competitive advantage they have been unable to achieve through their service performance.
  • If we were re-classified, the government would in effect give UPS unfair advantage and jeopardize the reliability of the FedEx integrated delivery network.   Such a change potentially causes major disruptions to commerce and consumers.

 

FedEx Express has always acknowledged that employees have the right to unionize if they so choose, and respects the laws and regulations that ensure that right. And the RLA does not prevent employees from unionizing—after all, more than 70 percent of employees covered by the RLA are represented by unions.

Of course, FedEx Express does prefer to deal directly with employees, without a third party in between. Our 38-year track record as one of America’s best places to work and best service providers shows that formula works very well for our employees and our customers.

With Congressional deliberations underway, we are doing everything in our power to communicate our position to legislators and to educate our customers, team members, and the public on the importance of our RLA status. The more people know, the more they’ll see that the 20 years of decisions by the courts and the regulators are right and that UPS is wrong.

We will marshal all our resources toward the defeat of any legislation that could so dramatically affect our fast, efficient service to customers.  For more information on the FedEx challenge to the UPS effort, go to brownbailout.com.

Tags: 
  • FAA Reauhtorization
  • FedEx Express
  • National Labor Relations Act
  • NLRA
  • Railway Labor Act
  • RLA

  • Fred Smith's posts

Fred Smith is completely

Submitted by Michael Pentecost on 06/25/09 - 1:45 pm
Fred Smith is completely accurate in his assesment of the RLA and NLRA. FedEx Express should remain under the RLA since all the criteria is being met. The fact the UPS tried to reclassify their employees under the RLA proves they see the benefit of operating under the RLA guidelines.
  • reply

25 year employee...been thru

Submitted by cheryl lafleur on 06/25/09 - 1:09 pm
25 year employee...been thru alot & hv seen alot but this is scary....but i strongly believe Mr. Smith will pull us all thru this...no doubt...
  • reply

As a nine year veteran of

Submitted by Ryan Fleck on 06/25/09 - 1:06 pm
As a nine year veteran of FedEx Express before joining the FedEx Ground family eighteen months ago I have come to respect, admire and enjoy the People, Service, Profit matrix FedEx, Inc. operates it OP-Cos. The success of this company was founded upon and continues to be a model of balance between human resourcing and profitability necessary to run a global commerce leading customer service network. Any smoke-and-mirror legistative wrangling on the part of other companies or legislative "deal-making" strikes at the heart of what has built the entreprenurial freedoms leading to the development of the strongest nation in the world. I work for FedEx Inc. because they are professionals that truly care about their employees and business partners. I do not want to work for a union nor do I see any positive outcome for my company with any change to the RLA. Please do not let the unions control FedEx! Respectfully, Ryan Fleck - Safety
  • reply

A lot of folks in the

Submitted by Fred Figueroa on 06/25/09 - 9:33 am
A lot of folks in the transportation industry forget what happen to R.E.A. the only competition that UPS had before the 1970's, UPS using a monopoly well finance transportation put R.E.A. out of business leaving UPS and the only transportation alternative to the American industries until Fedex Express and Roadway Express were successful establishing an alternative mode of transportation to the nations business. UPS will try to be the kind of the hill and if they are successful they will be able to maintain a very high price transportation product to all the industries with no consideration to customers needs and service. Fred Figueroa
  • reply

Please leave FedEx alone so

Submitted by Melody Harrison on 06/25/09 - 3:48 am
Please leave FedEx alone so we can continue to do our job that we have been doing so well. If it's not broke don't fix it. M. Harrison
  • reply

speaking personally, WE DO

Submitted by harold d bates sr on 06/24/09 - 4:52 pm
speaking personally, WE DO NOT, I Repeat, WE DO NOT WANT OR NEED A UNION,I've been with the company about 39 yrs (Flying Tigers and FED-EX)So far MY EXPERIENCE W/FEDEX IS EXCELLENT, So it think we should stay status as we are. A union would bring too many distractions
  • reply

I am a 20 plus year employee

Submitted by john r main on 06/24/09 - 4:33 pm
I am a 20 plus year employee at Fedex, I work for an airline and I expect to continue to work for an airline. UPS is bound to fail again as we shall succeed again as we always have.
  • reply

Post new comment

All comments are moderated. Comments will appear as soon as they are approved by the moderator. We will not post comments if they are defamatory, spam, off-topic If you do submit a comment, you warrant that it is your own original work, that it is not defamatory or offensive and does not infringe any law.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Blog Mission

Insights from our people into FedEx global citizenship programs.
More >
FedEx

Online Offers

Customer Focus

Shipping Services

Company Information

Using fedex.com